Hello Paul. Again another nit, please bear with me ... On Wednesday 06 July 2011, Paul Eggert wrote: > --- > ChangeLog | 6 ++++-- > modules/pselect | 2 ++ > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog > index e815b29..ba7d0e4 100644 > --- a/ChangeLog > +++ b/ChangeLog > @@ -2,8 +2,10 @@ > > * lib/pselect.c (pselect): Use plain name, without "rpl_". > Don't #undef, since we don't need any underlying pselect. > - * modules/pselect (Depends-on): Use our pselect.o if !HAVE_PSELECT. > - Both changes suggested by Bruno Haible. > + * modules/pselect (configure.ac): Use our pselect.o if !HAVE_PSELECT. > + (Depends-on): Add select. > + (Link): Add $(LIBSOCKET). > + These changes suggested by Bruno Haible. > Is it acceptable to edit the ChangeLog in this way? I've always thought that editing past ChangeLog entries was acceptable only to fix typos or other blunders.
> pselect: document better > * MODULES.html.sh (Support for systems lacking POSIX:2008): Add it. > diff --git a/modules/pselect b/modules/pselect > index 5f6291b..0e454d5 100644 > --- a/modules/pselect > +++ b/modules/pselect > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ m4/pselect.m4 > > Depends-on: > sys_select > +select [test $HAVE_PSELECT = 0 || test $REPLACE_PSELECT = 1] > > configure.ac: > gl_FUNC_PSELECT > @@ -21,6 +22,7 @@ Include: > <sys/select.h> > > Link: > +$(LIBSOCKET) > > License: > LGPLv2+ > Regards, Stefano