Le dimanche 3 juillet 2011 19:32:42, Bruno Haible a écrit : > Hi Bastien, > > > ... binding posix to fortran. > > Yes apparently it requires explicit binding code, cf. [1][2] > > > Would you consider this for inclusion ? > > Yes, why not? Fortran is sufficiently well supported by GCC and by > Automake. Just make sure that your modules follow the gnulib conventions > for the module descriptions - and here I'd say, put all the module > descriptions into a subdirectory modules/fortran/ -, and that you follow > the GNU conventions for Fortran code (whatever these may be - you can find > out by looking at octave in octave-3.4.2/libcruft/ [3]).
Ok thank you Fist piece of work will be to creat a gnulib module per posix header. I will begin by errno. How could I get a list of pair name/value of every errno supported on the plateform ? i will prefer a solution that work with a cross compiler. I am thinking about using cpp then sed but is ugly as hell... Bastien > Bruno > > [1] http://www.nongnu.org/posix90/ > [2] https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/posix90 > [3] http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/file/944cf42c699e/libcruft
