[redirecting to bug-gnulib] On 06/13/2011 05:27 PM, James Youngman wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> wrote: >> On 06/11/2011 07:42 PM, James Youngman wrote: >>> +++ b/find/find.c > [...] > > Thanks for these comments. They're addressed in the patch "Assume > SIGCHLD and O_NOFOLLOW are defined by gnulib" which I just mailed. > >> Gnulib should be taking care of that for you. I know that mingw still >> lacks SIGCHLD (of any spelling), but are there any modern systems that >> lack SIGCHLD but have SIGCLD? > > I know of none.
Widening the question: we're trying to get rid of a findutils construct: -#if defined SIGCLD && !defined SIGCHLD -# define SIGCHLD SIGCLD -#endif and need to know if gnulib's replacement <signal.h> needs to guarantee this definition of SIGCHLD, or if the only platforms where only SIGCLD existed are now so old to not be worth worrying about. -- Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com +1-801-349-2682 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
