On 03/14/2011 11:37 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Paolo Bonzini <bonz...@gnu.org> wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 17:10, Bastien ROUCARIES >> <roucaries.bast...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Paolo Bonzini <bonz...@gnu.org> wrote: >>>> On 03/14/2011 05:03 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Not sure BTW it will be really simple: >>>>> - send as oob data if fail with WSAEOPNOTSUPP come back to normal send >>>> >>>> But it will _always_ fail if people are using sendfd/recvfd as we (should) >>>> document it, i.e. on SOCK_DGRAM sockets! >>> >>> Yes and if it fail we will fall back to the normal send, so no fail >> >> So why try in the first place?!? > > In order to have a working solution for SOCK_STREAM
I'm confused. If we document that sendfd/recvfd only work for SOCK_DGRAM, then why do you want to support SOCK_STREAM? That is, if we are going to document the limitation, then why are you talking about working around the limitation? -- Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com +1-801-349-2682 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
