On 14 March 2011 14:23, Jim Meyering <[email protected]> wrote: > - exit (1); > - exit (0); > + return 1; > + return 1;
Was that intentional? i.e. should second return be return 0? -- http://rrt.sc3d.org
On 14 March 2011 14:23, Jim Meyering <[email protected]> wrote: > - exit (1); > - exit (0); > + return 1; > + return 1;
Was that intentional? i.e. should second return be return 0? -- http://rrt.sc3d.org