On 02/15/11 12:38, Paul Eggert wrote: >>> invariant (X)? gl_assume(X) seems like a good choice to me. "invariant" doesn't imply that "X" is either true or false and, as Paul said, the expression need not be constructed of invariant components. Yes, the result should be invariant (invariant-true or invariant-false?), but it is fuzzy. "gl_assume()" seems pretty clear to me.....
- [PATCH] vasnprintf: silence some clang false positives Eric Blake
- Re: [PATCH] vasnprintf: silence some clang false positiv... Bruno Haible
- Re: [PATCH] vasnprintf: silence some clang false pos... Eric Blake
- Re: [PATCH] vasnprintf: silence some clang false... Paul Eggert
- Re: [PATCH] vasnprintf: silence some clang f... Ben Pfaff
- Re: [PATCH] vasnprintf: silence some cl... Jim Meyering
- Re: [PATCH] vasnprintf: silence som... Paul Eggert
- Re: [PATCH] vasnprintf: silence... Jim Meyering
- static analysis assumption (was... Bruce Korb
- Re: [PATCH] vasnprintf: silence some clang f... Bruno Haible
- Re: [PATCH] vasnprintf: silence some cl... Paul Eggert