Sorry, I forgot to tell you that my OS is 10.6.6, 64-bit. ~Toni
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Alexander Hansen < alexanderk.han...@gmail.com> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 2/11/11 1:19 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > > On 02/11/2011 09:53 AM, Toni Venters wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> The update for coreutils doesn't seem to want to compile. It appears to > be > >> failing one of the tests that it runs. I've copied some of the print > out > >> below. > > > > Thanks for the report. > > > > First, coreutils _did_ compile, it's just the test that failed. You can > > probably install it anyways. > > Incorrect, as far as Fink goes. We generate binary packages for > installation, and we don't provide for resumption of the package build > process. > > One could in principle install the package by hand from the build > directory, or try to perform the steps that Fink does manually, but it's > probably easier just not to force the testsuite. > > > > >> FAIL: test-posixtm (exit: 1) > >> ============================ > >> > >> 000001010000.00 mismatch (-: actual; +:expected) > >> --62167132800 > >> +-62167219200 > >> 000012312359.59 return value mismatch: got 0, expected 1 > >> > > > > This particular test comes from gnulib, so I've added bug-gnulib in case > > someone there has better ideas on how to troubleshoot if it is a > > weakness in the test or a bug in fink's implementation of posixtm() that > > gnulib should be working around. > > > > > > > > > > Builds are on Mac OS X, by the way. > > As far as I can tell, the only occurrence of posixtm in Fink is in the > coreutils tarball, and we don't patch lib/posixtm.h or lib/posixtm.c in > the build process, so I don't see how it could be our implementation. > > The failure occurs for me when building on OS 10.6.4 (Intel), 64-bit > (I'm not sure what Toni has). The test passes on 10.5/32-bit and > 10.6/32-bit for me with the same package description--32 bit and 64 bit > use identical procedures. > - -- > Alexander Hansen, Ph.D. > Fink User Liaison > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAk1VjBwACgkQB8UpO3rKjQ+3rwCfeWEN5+fBMdsF56l4zPoYbAqM > LAYAoJRpURq/8OzijAUdXEc+a77m0GRn > =sTbV > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >
