On 01/31/2011 06:47 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > Is it any more efficient to use short-circuiting operators here (&& > instead of &)?
I tried it both ways on x86-64 with GCC 4.5.2, and & generated a few bytes less code than && did. I didn't investigate CPU-time performance, but I expect it's also a bit faster with &, in the typical case.
