Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Saturday, November 20, 2010 13:15:48 Bruno Haible wrote: > > Mike Frysinger writes: > > > uclibc defines __GLIBC__ > > > > More exactly, uClibc *usually* defines __GLIBC__, but not always. > > you can say the same exact thing about glibc. uClibc defines it in the same > way -- via features.h.
What I meant is that uClibc does not define __GLIBC__ if __FORCE_NOGLIBC is defined. For this reason, if you want to test for glibc OR uClibc, you can't do #if defined __GLIBC__ ; you have to write #if defined __GLIBC__ || defined __UCLIBC__ Bruno
