On 11/17/10 09:07, Eric Blake wrote: > Anyways, you can always use a directed push to say exactly what you > mean, rather than relying on the no-arg 'git push' defaults. Assuming > your local branch names match upstream: > > git push origin topic/libposix
OK, that looks easy: > $ git push origin topic/libposix > Everything up-to-date > $ OK, maybe not so much. I don't see any indications of a successful push, so I am guessing I did not push anything. >> To ssh://bk...@git.sv.gnu.org/srv/git/gnulib >> e633b39..2d39e49 topic/libposix -> topic/libposix >> ! [rejected] master -> master (non-fast-forward) >> error: failed to push some refs to >> 'ssh://bk...@git.sv.gnu.org/srv/git/gnulib' > > Yep - you've now rebased your libposix branch, but the 'git push' > defaults are still trying to push master as well. Changing those > defaults, or being more specific with your push request, will avoid that > problem. Have I actually pushed and not noticed? 8-O
