On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:40:39 -0400 Adam Stokes <a...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 20:34:11 +0200 > Bruno Haible <br...@clisp.org> wrote: > > > Hi Adam, > > > > > Is it possible to have posix_spawn* licenses relaxed to LGPLv2+? > > > > For what package is this? > > > > Have you considered releasing this package under LGPLv3+ instead of > > LGPLv2+? You know about the advantages of GPLv3+ and LGPLv3+ versus > > version 2: <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/rms-why-gplv3.html> > > > > Bruno > > > > The modules are posix_spawn and posix_spawnp which I need for the > windows port of http://fedorahosted.org/netcf. They are at LGPL > currently and show's you as the maintainer. > > Thanks, > Adam > CC'ing Laine Stump for input on netcf licensing
