Bruno Haible wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> But did you intend to remove 2009 from those
>> two copyright year lists?
>
> Yes, since the two files were not really changed in 2009. A years-old habit
> of mine...
No big deal, but the maintainers guide encourages us to update the
year lists regardless of whether there are changes in a given year:
It is recommended and simpler to add the new year to all files in the
package, and be done with it for the rest of the year.
>> They look fine.
>
> Tested with gcc 4.3 and 4.2. I pushed it.
Thanks!
