On 06/14/2010 01:56 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
>> Or even better, why not push those two tests upstream into autoconf,
>> then have gnulib override AC_FUNC_STRTOD if it detects older autoconf,
>> so that everyone using upstream AC_FUNC_STRTOD can reliably detect these
>> same bugs?
> 
> I don't think this would be better. The gnulib development of the last 7 years
> has shown that the autoconf macro that detects bugs of a system function and
> the replacement code that contains the workarounds to these bugs belong
> together and are best maintained together. It makes no sense to me to put the
> two files into different projects - autoconf and gnulib.
> 
> At this point, it would be a good idea to mark all AC_FUNC_* macros that
> request an AC_LIBOBJ replacement as obsolete and refer the user to Gnulib
> for both the macro and the workaround code (and the documentation).
> Except maybe AC_FUNC_MALLOC and AC_FUNC_REALLOC, because the replacement
> code for them is so trivial that anyone can make it up himself.

Good argument.  Are you able to write that patch soon, or should I
tackle it?

> The affected macros are:
>   - AC_FUNC_ERROR_AT_LINE
>   - AC_FUNC_GETLOADAVG
>   - AC_FUNC_LSTAT_FOLLOWS_SLASHED_SYMLINK
>   - AC_FUNC_MEMCMP
>   - AC_FUNC_MKTIME
>   - AC_FUNC_OBSTACK
>   - AC_FUNC_STAT, AC_FUNC_LSTAT
>   - AC_FUNC_STRTOD
>   - AC_FUNC_STRNLEN
>   - AC_REPLACE_FNMATCH

Looks like a reasonable list.

-- 
Eric Blake   ebl...@redhat.com    +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to