Hi Ben, > I noticed that there were references to > this preprocessor symbol and two related ones > (DEPENDS_ON_LIBCHARSET and DEPENDS_ON_LIBICONV) in > relocatable.c. Their purpose was not documented, but I think > that I figured out what they are for. I'm proposing the > following update to doc/relocatable-maint.texi in gnulib as > explanation.
Thanks for this text. Yes it is correct. Except for two details: - "... C preprocessor symbols to nonzero values" I would write "... C preprocessor symbols to 1" since there is no point in using other values than 1. - "(e.g. with +...@code{ac_define})" I would omit that, because in larger projects it's more appropriate to define these through AM_CPPFLAGS in some Makefile.am. I wish the list of libraries that support this mechanism was not hard-coded. Do you have an idea for making it extensible? Bruno