On 05/19/2010 12:30 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>> POSIX requires signals specified as names (HUP, INT, etc),
>> although XSI allows numbers for certain signals (the ones used by
>> gnulib all fall into this category).
> 
> We've had a similar discussion about this on an Autoconf list a while
> ago (with a Debian maintainer).  The Autoconf manual, Shell Portability
> chapter, lists 1 2 13 15 as signals which are safe to trap.  I'm not
> aware of any shell which does not accept these signal numbers in
> practice, except for maybe one that was written specifically to inflict
> extra pain upon shell script authors by explicitly disallowing them.

For a further analysis:

ash on cygwin understands _only_ numbers, not names.
posh on debian understands _only_ names, not numbers.

But ash on cygwin is quite old, and posh falls in the category of shells
that inflict extra pain upon shell script authors.

-- 
Eric Blake   [email protected]    +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to