Eric Blake wrote: > The following replacement headers are all under LGPL instead of LGPLv2+ > licensing. Any objection to relaxing them, so that projects like > libvirt can use all the replacement headers for things like > GNULIB_POSIXCHECK or passing Jim's recent maint.mk syntax check?
You need the agreement of all contributors since 2007-10-28: When we switched the implicit meaning of "LGPL" on that date, we promised that all changes up until then could be reverted to LGPLv2+ on demand. The non-trivial contributors since 2007-10-28 are, according to 'git': > fcntl-h you, me, Paolo > getopt-posix you, me, glibc > inttypes you, me, Paul > locale you, me > math you, me, Ben Pfaff > pty you, me > sched me > search you, me > spawn you, me > stdarg me > sysexits -- > > For the record, I'm okay with my contributions being relaxed I'm OK with mine too. glibc is still under LGPLv2+. So you still need the agreement of Paolo, Paul, and Ben. Bruno
