Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> writes:
> On 04/27/2010 03:24 PM, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
>> * lib/getdate.y (RELATIVE_TIME_0): Avoid a stupid 'const object should
>> have initializer' warning.
>>
>> @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ typedef struct
>> #if HAVE_COMPOUND_LITERALS
>> # define RELATIVE_TIME_0 ((relative_time) { 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 })
>> #else
>> -static relative_time const RELATIVE_TIME_0;
>> +static relative_time const RELATIVE_TIME_0 = { 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 };
>
> I would have used:
>
> static relative_time const RELATIVE_TIME_0 = { 0 };
>
> unless that also triggers a stupid warning.
Isn't
static relative_time const RELATIVE_TIME_0 = { };
equivalent too? I find that is a nice idiom.
/Simon
