Eric Blake wrote: > Any objections to relicensing cloexec as LGPL? Fine with me. If anyone asks for LGPLv2+ for this code, that would also be fine with me.
Bruno
Eric Blake wrote: > Any objections to relicensing cloexec as LGPL? Fine with me. If anyone asks for LGPLv2+ for this code, that would also be fine with me.
Bruno