Bruno Haible <br...@clisp.org> writes: >> How about this patch? Not tested on Solaris systems, but posted for >> review of my general idea. > > It's the right approach. But the name of the variable is not well chosen: > There are several functions defined in libnsl, therefore several modules > may want to define LIBNSL to nonempty when the particular function needs > to be pulled in from libnsl. These variables would clash. > > I'm committing the following:
Fine to me, thanks. /Simon
