David Lutterkort wrote: > > Would you also accept to change the license mentioned in the header > > to say "GPL", like we do for the rest of gnulib? (The files stay under > > LGPLv2+, since we don't change modules/safe-alloc?) > > Yes, that's fine by me - as long as the license for the module stays > LGPLv2+, I am happy (that's the license of the original code in libvirt > that safe-alloc is based on)
OK, so I committed that. Bruno
