Hi Jim, et al., On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 7:39 AM, Jim Meyering<j...@meyering.net> wrote: > I read this: http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-2243/mkstemps-3c?a=view > > int mkstemps(char *template, int slen); > ... > > Description > ... > > The mkstemps() function behaves the same as mkstemp(), except it
Silly me, I just have to ask (rhetorically): Why is this nice, new interface cooked up and then left unfinished. It needs "mkdtemps", too, yes? Just for symmetry, if nothing else.... ========== as for always constructing files in a temp subdirectory, sometimes it is inconvenient to make x.c files in another directory and adjust relative "-I" options, for example. "Cool" :) Thank you - Bruce