Hi Jim, Thanks for your understanding.
> It's not a big deal for me, now that I'm used to seeing no documentation > in gnulib's .c files for certain public functions, but it still does rankle > a little, each time I notice. Well, for me, it's the opposite: I start boiling a bit, each time I see a public header file without documentation, or a function declaration that mentions only the types of the parameters and not their meaning. > He has explained that he does this > in an attempt to make it easier to find for *users* of the function. Yes, and the functions are used more often than they are modified. Anyway, in this case I was mostly protesting because of the references to other pieces of documentation, which are hard to follow in a medium that does not support hyperlinks. Sergey solved it fine. Bruno
