Ben Pfaff wrote:
Bruno Haible <br...@clisp.org> writes:What do the others think? Should we possibly extend stdlib.in.h so that abort() becomes a macro that produces a detailed error message, similar to what assert() does?Just changing abort() to assert(0) would improve the diagnostics significantly.
Sounds good. Actually, assert(foo()) instead of if (!foo()) assert(0) wil probably produce an even better error message.
