James Youngman wrote: > This conflates two separate issues though: > 1. Which license the developer chooses to use and their strategy for updating > it > 2. The technical process by which the project manages files from > gnulib (e.g. checking them into the repository for their own project > versus not doing that) > > I think it would be great it exercising a deliberate choice on (1) > didn't force my hand on (2).
So, are you in favour of removing the 'fdl' module (and let people use gnulib-tool --copy-file regardless of their updating strategy), or for creating modules 'fdl-1.2', 'fdl-1.3' (and let people use gnulib-tool --import for them)? Bruno
