Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Pádraig Brady <p...@draigbrady.com> writes:
>
>> So would this simplification be appropriate, which just handles systems
>> where utime("file", &ut); is OK while utime("file", NULL); is not?
>
> Note that utime(,0) requires less privileges than utime(,&ut). For the
> latter you need to be owner, whereas the former only requires write
> access.
Ah right. I think that deserves a comment.
So in the utime("file", NULL) emulation,
should we only be handling S_ISREG?
cheers,
Pádraig.
