Simon Josefsson wrote: > Given that the parameter is called --version-script, I think > "version-script" would be a better name for the module.
Even the suffix "-script" is a bit of a misnomer, IMO. I would call it 'symbol-versions'. If you agree with that, I'll rename the 'visbility' module to 'symbol-visibility', for consistency. > It seems (a) has already been fixed right? Nearly. Forgot to commit doc/gnulib.texi yesterday. Now I merged with your commit: *** doc/gnulib.texi.orig 2009-03-03 12:13:51.000000000 +0100 --- doc/gnulib.texi 2009-03-03 12:11:38.000000000 +0100 *************** *** 5821,5832 **** * gcd:: * Regular expressions:: * Searching for Libraries:: * Supporting Relocation:: * func:: * warnings:: * manywarnings:: - * visibility:: - * LD Version Scripts:: @end menu @node alloca --- 5821,5832 ---- * gcd:: * Regular expressions:: * Searching for Libraries:: + * Exported Symbols of Shared Libraries:: + * LD Version Scripts:: * Supporting Relocation:: * func:: * warnings:: * manywarnings:: @end menu @node alloca *************** *** 5911,5916 **** --- 5911,5920 ---- @include havelib.texi + @include visibility.texi + + @include ld-version-script.texi + @include relocatable-maint.texi @include func.texi *************** *** 5919,5928 **** @include manywarnings.texi - @include visibility.texi - - @include ld-version-script.texi - @node GNU Free Documentation License @appendix GNU Free Documentation License --- 5923,5928 ---- *** doc/visibility.texi.orig 2009-03-03 12:13:51.000000000 +0100 --- doc/visibility.texi 2009-03-03 12:11:35.000000000 +0100 *************** *** 1,5 **** ! @node visibility ! @section visibility @c Documentation of gnulib module 'visibility'. --- 1,5 ---- ! @node Exported Symbols of Shared Libraries ! @section Controlling the Exported Symbols of Shared Libraries @c Documentation of gnulib module 'visibility'.
