On Fri, 26. Dec 2008, 01:35:46 +0100, Bruno Haible wrote: > > Here's an updated > > patch. I used memcpy() because POSIX requires silent truncation of the > > option value in case optlen is smaller than necessary. > > Looks all fine to me, but it's Simon and Paolo who have to decide on this. > > > Is there a reason that the replacement getsockopt and setsockopt > > functions do not use the POSIX prototype (pointers with the 'restrict' > > keyword, length arguments with socklen_t)? > > Good point. The prototypes should have socklen_t. Here is another proposed > patch, also for consideration by Simon and Paolo.
Simon, Paolo, do you have any comments on the patches suggested in this thread? Martin
