On Wednesday 28 January 2009 05:02:37 Bruno Haible wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > i mean something simple like this (and the output from gnulib-tool still > > looks sane to me): > > --- a/modules/memcpy > > +++ b/modules/memcpy > > @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Status: > > obsolete > > > > Notice: > > -This module is obsolete. > > +This module is obsolete (see gnulib.info::Obsolete modules). > > > > Files: > > lib/memcpy.c > > IMO that is excess verbosity. People have to learn by themselves that they > can look into the documentation.
i disagree, but you're the boss ;) > I'm not opposed to links into the doc in > general, and if the output would be in HTML > <a href="gnulib.html#Obsolete-modules">obsolete</a> > I would in favour of it. But for plain-text output, it's too verbose. is this linking generated automatically now ? or does something else need to happen first ? thanks for the doc updates! -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
