Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> The Winsock replacement of close is triggered by the socket and accept >> modules. > > I prefer and propose to not trigger the 'close' module from 'socket' or > 'accept', and instead - just like for select - rely on the link error or > the warning of someone tries to use close() with sockets enabled > (recall: a link error when compiling on mingw, a warning when compiling > with GNULIB_POSIXCHECK on Linux).
+1 > Ok? I looked over the code, and think the general approach is good. I'll test it once it is pushed. Thanks, Simon