Eric Blake wrote:
> > Except that getndelim2 and memchr2 are GPL, while freadptr and freadseek
> > are LGPL (I assume v3+). Would it be okay to change all four to LGPLv2+?
>
> I'm okay with memchr2 being LGPLv2+; it does little more than memchr,
> which is a basic libc function. Since freadptr and freadseek pre-date the
> licensing switch, they should also be okay. The real question boils down
> to whether getndelim2 is okay as LGPLv2+, or whether it represents enough
> of a GNU extension to keep it GPL.
That latter question being resolved now, I committed the license changes
that you suggested:
2008-09-06 Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* modules/freadptr (License): Change to LGPLv2+.
* modules/freadseek (License): Likewise.
Suggested by Eric Blake.
* modules/memchr2 (License): Change to LGPLv2+.
Approved by Eric Blake.
--- modules/freadptr.orig 2008-09-06 12:09:40.000000000 +0200
+++ modules/freadptr 2008-09-06 12:08:41.000000000 +0200
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
"freadptr.h"
License:
-LGPL
+LGPLv2+
Maintainer:
Bruno Haible
--- modules/freadseek.orig 2008-09-06 12:09:40.000000000 +0200
+++ modules/freadseek 2008-09-06 12:08:37.000000000 +0200
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
"freadseek.h"
License:
-LGPL
+LGPLv2+
Maintainer:
Bruno Haible
--- modules/memchr2.orig 2008-09-06 12:09:40.000000000 +0200
+++ modules/memchr2 2008-09-06 12:08:32.000000000 +0200
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
"memchr2.h"
License:
-GPL
+LGPLv2+
Maintainer:
Eric Blake
