Eric Blake wrote: > for this particular usage, I don't think we will ever use > AC_REPLACE_FUNC with a file name that falls in this category.
Yes, and the used of prefixed identifiers (prefix "AC_", "gl_" etc.) for active macros pretty much excludes that any file name or function name gets active in the gl_LIBSOURCES_LIST. Btw, does the use of m4_append_uniq cause quadratic runtime? I.e. when there are n invocations of AC_LIBSOURCES, will the time spent in the m4_append_uniq calls be O(n²) total? Would it be O(n) total if m4_append was used instead? Bruno
