Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm slightly leery of adding a test for a non-essential tool like > vc-list-files, since everyone who uses the module will now pull in > this test, and possibly get a test failure. Such a failure doesn't > really matter in general -- most people don't run "make syntax-check" > or "make distcheck" -- so a test failure here is most definitely no > cause for alarm and no reason not to install the package. > > Of course, gnulib-using packages that want to avoid a test like > this can easily just exclude it. > > Opinions?
I've gone ahead and pushed that. I figure that if someone cares enough to use the vc-list-files module, they're interested in knowing if/when it doesn't work.
