Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> The follow patch appear to silent compiler warnings. Can anyone think >> of a better way to fix this? If not I'll commit and push this shortly. > [...] >> +# if defined _WIN32 || defined __WIN32__ >> +# define setsockopt(a,b,c,d,e) setsockopt(a,b,c,(const void*)(d),e) >> +# endif > > I do not know whether it is better, but the following is more > type-safe: > > # if defined _WIN32 || defined __WIN32__ > # define setsockopt(a,b,c,d,e) rpl_setsockopt(a,b,c,d,e) > static inline int > rpl_setsockopt(int socket, int level, int optname, const void *optval, > socklen_t optlen) > { > return (setsockopt)(socket, level, optname, optval, optlen); > } > # endif
Applied, thanks. (Windows setsockopt has a 'int' final parameter, although socklen_t is int on Windows.) /Simon