-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Simon Josefsson wrote: >>> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/strftime.html >>> >>> that specifier was not part of SUS. >> Um, I see it on that page, don't you? > > Yes, so that makes it part of POSIX. Further down on that page, though, > it says that it wasn't part of SUS.
No, further on down the page, it says it was added to POSIX to align it _with_ SUS. In any case, it's obviously now part of both, so calling it "non-SUS" strikes me as misleading. (AFAICT there is currently nothing in POSIX that is not also in SUS: that's why there are inclusion qualifiers to mark something as SUS but not POSIX (XSI), but not vice versa.) - -- Micah J. Cowan Programmer, musician, typesetting enthusiast, gamer, and GNU Wget Project Maintainer. http://micah.cowan.name/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFICOO87M8hyUobTrERAnMSAJwJ8/1x1hOGJgBbvdoNTiQfZft/jACfesHY Zp2qba8/uN7GIclN94ZBxaI= =H1F8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
