Hi In lib/lock.h, there is stub code to allow compilation event when no threading is supported, but it is missing the various destroy functions.
Patch is attached following the existing conventions. I think, though, that at least some of the stubs ought to expand to "((void) 0)" rather than nothing. Bruce -- Dr Bruce Merry bmerry <@> gmail <.> com http://www.brucemerry.org.za/ http://blog.brucemerry.org.za/ 43rd law of computing: Anything that can go wr Segmentation fault - core dumped
>From 38352fed5661da3c185b8ce97348d9f1df01558e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bruce Merry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 20:33:15 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Add missing destroy functions --- lib/lock.h | 3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/lock.h b/lib/lock.h index 0b5f8e3..8535273 100644 --- a/lib/lock.h +++ b/lib/lock.h @@ -1062,6 +1062,7 @@ typedef int gl_lock_t; # define gl_lock_init(NAME) # define gl_lock_lock(NAME) # define gl_lock_unlock(NAME) +# define gl_lock_destroy(NAME) /* ------------------------- gl_rwlock_t datatype ------------------------- */ @@ -1072,6 +1073,7 @@ typedef int gl_rwlock_t; # define gl_rwlock_rdlock(NAME) # define gl_rwlock_wrlock(NAME) # define gl_rwlock_unlock(NAME) +# define gl_rwlock_destroy(NAME) /* --------------------- gl_recursive_lock_t datatype --------------------- */ @@ -1081,6 +1083,7 @@ typedef int gl_recursive_lock_t; # define gl_recursive_lock_init(NAME) # define gl_recursive_lock_lock(NAME) # define gl_recursive_lock_unlock(NAME) +# define gl_recursive_lock_destroy(NAME) /* -------------------------- gl_once_t datatype -------------------------- */ -- 1.5.3.7
