Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Simon Josefsson wrote: >> If there are other pre-C99 compilers that use other ways of printing the >> function name, I suppose the module could be extended with those. > > According to boost/current_function.hpp, it appears that > - GNU C is not the only compiler to support __PRETTY_FUNCTION__; > Metrowerks and Intel icc may do the same. > - Some Intel compilers and some IBM compilers may support __FUNCTION__. > > But this info may be out of date. Here's what I verified: > > - Intel icc version 9.1 supports __func__, __FUNCTION__, > __PRETTY_FUNCTION__, > like GNU C does. And it does not define __STDC_VERSION__. > > - HP-UX 11 cc supports __func__, __FUNCTION__. And it does not define > __STDC_VERSION__ either.
Thanks for testing. As far as I can infer, there is no point in testing for anything other than __func__ since all platforms that support other symbols also support __func__? If we find a platform which doesn't have __func__, but have __FUNCTION__ or something else, we can map the latter to the former. Then we'll know which platforms are really affected, and can document it better. /Simon
