James Youngman wrote: > Don't forget that the code you are commenting about is not itself part > of the module. ... > This is a proposed gnulib module, it should be no > surprise that it is not a substitute for adequate package > documentation.
But if the main usecase of the proposed module has such a weak justification, what is the remaining rationale for the module? Besides that, the module is overkill: It is using the large 'getdate' module to do something at runtime that it could also do with much less code: conversion of a date in ISO 8601 format to a time_t. Bruno
