Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thus, I think it is appropriate to rename the current efficient 'memmem' > gnulib module to 'memmem-fast' and revert to the glibc implementation in > the gnulib 'memmem' module.
A minor point: Was the intent to propagate this into the glibc version? If so, perhaps better names are "memmem" for the fast version and and "memmem-simple" for the simple one. > the maintainer field (who wants to be gnulib maintainer of the fast > version? I don't think it makes sense for it to read either glibc or > me). I'd just say "All".
