"Bruno Haible" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Paul Eggert wrote: >> section 6.2.6.1: >> ... >> Here again, the intent is that memcmp(&x, &y, sizeof (T)) compares all >> the bits in the underlying representation. The only way to do that >> portably is via "unsigned char *". > > OK. Here's a proposed patch for the memmem function.
Your patch didn't reach the list.
