Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> But I don't much like that the symbol HAVE_DECL_ISFINITE denotes something
> different than whether the isfinite macro is declared. This will be confusing
> in the future. OK to replace it by the inversion of REPLACE_ISFINITE, like
> this?

Yes, please apply.
-- 
Ben Pfaff 
http://benpfaff.org


Reply via email to