Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But I don't much like that the symbol HAVE_DECL_ISFINITE denotes something > different than whether the isfinite macro is declared. This will be confusing > in the future. OK to replace it by the inversion of REPLACE_ISFINITE, like > this?
Yes, please apply. -- Ben Pfaff http://benpfaff.org