Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Colin Watson wrote: >> I was trying to prepare a test case for you, but I find that now I >> cannot reproduce the problem, either with VPATH or non-VPATH builds! It >> seems there must have been some junk lying around in my tree after all, > ... >> >> http://people.debian.org/~cjwatson/tmp/man-db-gnulib.tar.gz > > The -I options in this tar file looks fine for me, whether in a VPATH build > or not. > > So the situation is probably not so frequent. I will therefore write > the usual rpl_ prefix in those functions that invoke the system's function, > but do without the - hard to maintain - #error. > > Applying the appended patch and proposing this additional patch. > Paul, Jim, what do you think of this?
They look fine to me. Go ahead.
