Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Compilers such as Sun C++ really define NULL to 0 > (in both C and C++ mode!), and misinterpret NULL in varargs and sizeof.
The problem with varargs is one that has bitten me personally. Ouch! But "sizeof (NULL)" is a new one on me. As near as I can make out, that expression can yield any nonnegative value, as far as the C standard is concerned. I'd be mildly surprised to find any useful, portable code that contains "sizeof (NULL)"; normally I would think "bug" if I saw such an expression. This is a trivial point by itself, but I'm raising it since I'm a bit worried that I am missing something nontrivial here.
