Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Simon Josefsson wrote: >> I needed the following modules under LGPLv2.1+: >> >> dummy >> float >> realloc >> stdlib >> >> Any objections to this patch? > > No objection. We promised you the ability to do such changes, see > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2007-07/msg00155.html
Installed, thanks for quick response. >> Btw, why is the mnemonic 'LGPLv2+' rather than 'LGPLv2.1+'? > > Because it's just a shorthand. It's not worth making the distinction > between LGPL 2.0 and 2.1 in this context, IMO. Right. /Simon