Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I got around to reviewing this and noticed one minor problem: > the code will mistakenly reject an implementation that (say) > has a 72-bit word but where 8 bits are padding bits, i.e., they > do not contribute to the value. [...]
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At this point, IMO, it would be useful to add comments: Many thanks to you both. I committed these improvements. -- "Implementation details are beyond the scope of the Java virtual machine specification. One should not assume that every virtual machine implementation contains a giant squid." --"Mr. Bunny's Big Cup o' Java"
