Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> The sequence of events that I'm hoping for is this: >> - First, get agreement that all projects that use gnulib are OK with GPLv3. > > I don't hear any objection, so let's assume there's agreement on that topic.
I'd prefer to wait a bit, to get a feeling of how serious the GPLv2-only situation is. We can implement a --gplv3 parameter om gnulib if you don't want to have GPLv2 mentioned in your sources. GnuTLS links to a GPLv2-only project (liblzo) and until that issue has been settled, it would cause problems if gnulib became GPLv3-only. I think several of my projects may be used by projects that contain some GPLv2-only code, and waiting until users settle the problem would be nicer. /Simon
