Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Regression: PATH values with a trailing empty field, such as > PATH=/usr/bin:/bin: > are not handled correctly.
I see the problem in general, but is that an issue for this particular case? gnulib-tool needn't cater to empty entries in PATH. It's fine with me if there's a test like this: case $PATH in *::* | :* | *:) echo 'Please use "." rather than empty entries in PATH."; exit 1 esac
