Bruno Haible <bruno <at> clisp.org> writes: > > Hi all, > > This is a request for testing. The *printf-posix modules should not work > fine and pass all tests on > IRIX 6.5
I noticed you added a patch that allows "nan0x7fffffff" instead of "nan". My reading of POSIX says this is illegal and that IRIX has a bug; if the n-char- sequence form of NaN is used, it must be in the style "nan(0x7fffffff)", with the ( and ) as literal characters. Compare the wording in C99 and POSIX for strtod() and nan(). -- Eric Blake
