Eric Blake wrote: > >> + dnl We cannot use AC_CHECK_HEADERS_ONCE here, because that would make > >> + dnl the check for those headers unconditional; yet cygwin reports > >> + dnl that the headers are present but cannot be compiled (since on > >> + dnl cygwin, all socket information should come from netinet/in.h). > >> + > >> + AC_CHECK_HEADERS([netinet/in.h]) > > > > _Too much_ copy-n-paste from the sys/socket module.
Simon Josefsson wrote: > I agree with this objection, but other than that, the general approach > that Bruno proposed seems like the right thing to me. OK, I dropped the misplaced comment, and applied the patch. Bruno
