I've just checked in the following change: fts.c: a small readability/maintainability improvement * lib/fts.c (fts_read): Make this code slightly more readable and maintainable by hoisting the "sp->fts_cur = p" assignments to immediately follow the statements that set P. Derived from the patch by Miloslav Trmac in http://bugzilla.redhat.com/222089.
Index: lib/fts.c =================================================================== RCS file: /sources/gnulib/gnulib/lib/fts.c,v retrieving revision 1.33 diff -u -p -r1.33 fts.c --- lib/fts.c 8 Jan 2007 21:28:13 -0000 1.33 +++ lib/fts.c 10 Jan 2007 16:28:43 -0000 @@ -698,6 +698,7 @@ fts_read (register FTS *sp) /* Move to the next node on this level. */ next: tmp = p; if ((p = p->fts_link) != NULL) { + sp->fts_cur = p; free(tmp); /* @@ -708,7 +709,6 @@ next: tmp = p; if (p->fts_level == FTS_ROOTLEVEL) { if (RESTORE_INITIAL_CWD(sp)) { SET(FTS_STOP); - sp->fts_cur = p; return (NULL); } fts_load(sp, p); @@ -738,6 +738,7 @@ name: t = sp->fts_path + NAPPEND(p->fts *t++ = '/'; memmove(t, p->fts_name, p->fts_namelen + 1); check_for_dir: + sp->fts_cur = p; if (p->fts_info == FTS_NSOK) { if (p->fts_statp->st_size == FTS_STAT_REQUIRED) @@ -746,7 +747,6 @@ check_for_dir: fts_assert (p->fts_statp->st_size == FTS_NO_STAT_REQUIRED); } - sp->fts_cur = p; if (p->fts_info == FTS_D) { /* Now that P->fts_statp is guaranteed to be valid, @@ -766,6 +766,7 @@ check_for_dir: /* Move up to the parent node. */ p = tmp->fts_parent; + sp->fts_cur = p; free(tmp); if (p->fts_level == FTS_ROOTPARENTLEVEL) { @@ -811,7 +812,6 @@ check_for_dir: p->fts_info = p->fts_errno ? FTS_ERR : FTS_DP; if (p->fts_errno == 0) LEAVE_DIR (sp, p, "3"); - sp->fts_cur = p; return ISSET(FTS_STOP) ? NULL : p; }