Re: bug in getaddrinfo.c

[Simon Josefsson]

eponymous alias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> The getaddrinfo.c file contains these lines within getaddrinfo():
>
>    151    if (hints && (hints->ai_flags & ~(AI_CANONNAME|AI_PASSIVE)))
>    152      /* FIXME: Support more flags. */
>    153      return EAI_BADFLAGS;
>
> followed later by:
>
>    181        if (!(hints->ai_flags & AI_NUMERICSERV))
>    182          /* FIXME: Use getservbyname_r if available. */
>    183          se = getservbyname (servname, proto);
>
> But to properly support this latter code, the earlier test must include
> the AI_NUMERICSERV flag.

Thanks, could you test the patch below?  Please also test if
AI_NUMERICSERV really works.  If it doesn't work, the flag probably
should be rejected.  The code seems untested.

/Simon

2006-11-28  Simon Josefsson  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

        * lib/getaddrinfo.c (getaddrinfo): Don't reject AI_NUMERICSERV
        flags.  Reported by eponymous alias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

--- getaddrinfo.c       17 Nov 2006 14:45:55 +0100      1.20
+++ getaddrinfo.c       28 Nov 2006 21:12:05 +0100      
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@
     return getaddrinfo_ptr (nodename, servname, hints, res);
 #endif
 
-  if (hints && (hints->ai_flags & ~(AI_CANONNAME|AI_PASSIVE)))
+  if (hints && (hints->ai_flags & ~(AI_CANONNAME|AI_PASSIVE|AI_NUMERICSERV)))
     /* FIXME: Support more flags. */
     return EAI_BADFLAGS;